EMERSON HALL
19
pendence, a document so anti-Emersonian in its conception of man;
and he does not mean the liberty after which, as he says, the slaves
are crowing while most men are slaves. No, we are free as responsible
agents of our morality. We are free with that freedom which annuls
fate; and if there is fate, then freedom is its most necessary part.
“Forever wells up the impulse of choosing and acting in the soul.”
“So far as man thinks he is free.” “Before the revelations of the
soul, time, space, and nature shrink away.” “ Events are grown on
the same stem with the personality; they are sub-personalities.”
“We are not built like a ship to be tossed, but like a house to stand.”
This freedom alone gives meaning to our life with its duties, and
puts the accent of the world’s history on the individual, on the person¬
ality: “All history resolves itself very easily into the biography of a
few stout and earnest persons,” and “An institution is the lengthened
shadow of a man.”
Nature speaks to us, Freedom speaks in us, but through us speaks
a Soul that is more than individual, an over-individual soul, an “ Over¬
soul, within which every man is contained and made one with all
others.” Now even “Nature is a great shadow, pointing always to
the sun behind her.” Every one of us belongs to an absolute con¬
sciousness which in us and through us wills its will; “Men descend
to meet” and “Jove nods to Jove from behind each of us.” Yes,
“Man is conscious of a universal soul within or behind his individual
life, wherein as in a firmament justice, truth, love, freedom arise and
shine.” The ideals, the duties, the obligations, are not man’s will but
the will of an Absolute.
Does not all this sound like a wilful denial of all that has been
fixed by the sciences of our time ? Does not every Sophomore who
has had his courses in Physics, Psychology, and Sociologyknow
better? He knows, we all know, that the processes of Nature stand
under physical laws, that the will of man is the necessary outcome, of
psychological laws, that the ideals of man are the products of human
civilization and sociological laws. And if every atom in the universe
moves according to the laws which physics and chemistry, astronomy
and geology, have discovered, is it not anti-scientific sentimentality
to seek a meaning and thoughts in the mechanical motions of the dead
world of substance ? So the poet may speak, but we ought not to say
that his fanciful dreams have value for scholarly philosophers. The
philosophy of the scientist ought to be the acknowledgment that
matter and energy, and space and time are eternal, and that the
smallest grain of sand and the largest solar system move meaningless
by blind causality.