Bauhaus-Universität Weimar

Titel:
Helmholtz's treatise on physiological optics. Volume 2. Edited by James P. C. Southall. Translated from the 3rd German edition
Person:
Helmholtz, Hermann von
PURL:
https://digitalesammlungen.uni-weimar.de/viewer/image/lit39650/424/
K. 346, 347.] 
I. Normal and Anomalous Colour Systems 
411 
Perhaps connected with the difficulty of recognizing the right 
colour, is another peculiarity that Nagel found to be very notice able in 
all anomalous persons. This was what appeared to be an accentuation 
of certain contrast phenomena. For example, a yellow field viewed 
by itself is described correctly as yellow; but if it is displayed alongside 
a red field, it is then called green. This is the explanation of what is 
practically a very important fact, namely, that in observing two 
adjacent objects of different colours, anomalous persons are liable to 
make big mistakes that would be entirely out of the question in normal 
vision. Thus a gaslight or electric light of the usual pale yellow colour 
is taken for green if it is put by the side of a red light. 
Note by v. Kries 
(Prepared specially for insertion here, January 1924) 
In recent years extensive studies have been made on the connections 
between the various forms of anomalous colour vision. Hess1, in 
particular, has carried out very thorough investigations on this subject. 
The writer will limit himself here to a brief discussion of the matter so 
far as it has to do with typical dichromats (protanopes and deuter- 
anopes). 
The old view, as represented by Seebeck and Helmholtz, namely, 
that the cases of congenital partial colour blindness were arranged in 
two typically different groups not connected by any transitions, had 
been, as stated above, fully established by systematic testing of 
colour-mixture equations. Hess has again challenged this fact. The 
particular support on which he relies is that even within each group 
there are considerable differences in the mode of vision. However, 
Hess’s observations were not made under conditions that insure pure 
daylight vision, and for this reason alone decisive importance cannot 
be attached to them. For the point that is of theoretical interest is, 
whether or not there is a distinct difference between the mechanisms of 
daylight vision in the protanopic and deuteranopic visual organs. This 
question can only be decided by observations where precautions have 
been taken to insure practically pure cone vision, by having the eye 
light-adapted and the observation confined to a small field. If, for 
1 y. Hess, Die Rot-Grün-Blindheiten. Pflügers Archiv, CLXXXV. 1920.—Idem, Die 
angeborenen Farbensinnstörungen und das Farbengesichtsfeld. Archiv, f. Augenheilkunde, 
LXXXVI. 1920. — v. Hess gave a very thorough account of the subject in his article on 
“Farbenlehre” in the Ergebnissen der Physiologie, Bd. XX. p. 1. 1922. See y. Kries’s re¬ 
view of this article, Zur physiologischen Farbenlehre, Klinische Monatsblätter f. Augen¬ 
heilkunde, LXX. p. 577. 1923.
        

Nutzerhinweis

Sehr geehrte Benutzer,

aufgrund der aktuellen Entwicklungen in der Webtechnologie, die im Goobi viewer verwendet wird, unterstützt die Software den von Ihnen verwendeten Browser nicht mehr.

Bitte benutzen Sie einen der folgenden Browser, um diese Seite korrekt darstellen zu können.

Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis.