318
and
Gratehue
parody on the romances of chivalry, and combines a jovial fatire upon
everything, which, as has been remarked, fpares neither religion nor
politics, fcience nor literature, popes, kings, clergy, nobility, or people.
It contifts of twenty-five cantos, or, as they are termed in the original,
phantqfice, fantaties. In the firlt we are told of the origin of Baldus.
There was at the court of France a famous knight named Guy, defcended
from that memorable paladin Renaud of Montauban. The king, who
lhowed a particular efteem for Guy, had alfo a daughter of furpalling
beauty, named Balduine, who had fallen in love with Guy, and he was
equally amorous of the princefs. In the fequel of a grand tournament,
at which Guy has diftinguithed himfelf greatly, he carries off Balduine,
and the two lovers fly on foot, in the difguife of beggars, reach the
Alps in fafety, and crofs them into Italy. At Cipada, in the territory
of Brefcia, they are hofpitably entertained by a generous peafant named
Berte Panade, with whom the princefs Balcluine, who approaches her time
of confinement, is left; while her lover goes forth to conquer at leafl a
marquifate for her. After his departure the gives birth to a fine boy, which
is named Baldus. Such, as told in the fecond canto, is the origin of
Folengo's hero, who is deftined to perform marvellous acts of chivalry.
The peafant Berte Panade has alfo a fon named Zambellus, by a mother
who had died in childbirth of him. Baldus paffes for the fon of Berte
alfo, fo that the two are fuppofed to be brothers. Baldus is fuccefiively
led through a feries of extraordinary adventures, fome low and vulgar,
others more chivalrous, and fome of them exhibiting a wild fertility of
imagination, which are too long to enable me to take my readers through
them, until at length he is left by the poet in the country of F alfehood and
Charlatanitin, which is inhabited by aitrologers, necromanoers, and poets.
Thus is the hero Baldus dragged through a great number of marvellous
accidents, fome of them vulgar, many of them ridiculous, and forne,
again, wildly poetical, but all of them prefenting, in one form or other,
an opportunity for fatire upon fame of the follies, or vices, or corruptions
of his age. The hybrid language in which the Whole is written, gives
it a fmgularly grotefque appearance; yet from time to time we have
patfages which {how that the author was capable of writing true poetry,
although