in
and Art.
Literature
275
fhepherds, while [till wrangling with Mak and his wife, are feized with
drowiinefs, and lie down to fleep; but they are aroufed by the voice of
the angel, who proclaims the birth of the Saviour. The next play in
which the drollery is introduced, is that of " Herod and the Slaughter of
the Innocents." Herod's bluiter and bombatt, and the vulgar abufe
which patles between the Hebrew mothers and the foldiers who are
murdering their children, are wonderfully laughable. The plays which
represented the arreft, trial, and execution of J efus, are all full of drollery,
for the grotefque character which had been given to the demons in the
earlier middle ages, appears to have been transferred to the executioners,
or, as they were called, the " tormentors," and the language and manner
in which they executed their duties, mutt have kept the audience in a
continual roar of laughter. In the play of "Doomfday," the fiends
retained their old character, and the manner in which they joke over the
diftrefs of the finful fouls, and the details they give of their finfulnefs, are
equally mirth-provoking. The "Coventry Myfteries" are alfo printed
from a manufcript of the middle of the fifteenth century, and are,
perhaps, as old as the " Towneley Myfteries." They contift of forty-two
plays, but they contain, on the Whole, fewer droll fcenes than thofe of
the Towneley collection. But a very remarkable example is furnifhed in
the play of the "Trial of Jofeph and Mary," which is a very grotefque
picture of the proceedings in a mediaeval confittory court. The fompnour,
a character fo well known by Chaucer's picture of him, opens the piece
by reading from his book a long lift of offenders againtt chatlity. At its
concluiion, two " detractors " make their appearance, who repeat various
fcandalous ltories againtt the Virgin Mary and her huiband Jofeph, which
are overheard by fome of the high oiiicers of the court, and Mary and
Jofeph are formally accufed and placed upon their trial. The trial itfelf
is a fcene of low ribaldry, which can only have afforded amufement to a
very vulgar audience. There is a certain amount of the fame kind of
indelicate drollery in the play of " The Woman taken in Adultery," in
this collection. The " Cheiier Mytteries " are tiill more fparing of fuch
fcenes, but they are printed from manufcripts written after the Reforma-
tion, which had, perhaps, gone through the procefs of expurgation, in
which