in
Literature
and Art.
I4-5
grotefque features, like the grinning through the horfe-collar, gave
fatisfaction by their mere uglinefs. Even the applications, when fuch
figures were intended to have one, were coarfely fatirical, without any
intelleetuality, and, where they had a meaning beyond the plain text of
the fcuipture or drawing, it was not far-fetched, but plain and eafily
underttood. When the Anglo-Saxon drew the face of a bloated and
disfigured monk, he no doubt intended thereby to proclaim the popular
notion of the general character of monaftic life, but this was a deflgn
which nobody could mifunderfland, an interpretation which everybody
was prepared to give to it. We have already feen various examples of
this defcription of fatire, fcattered here and there among the immenfe
mats of grotefque fculpture which has no fuch meaning. A great
proportion, indeed, of thefe grotefque fculptures appears to prefent mere
variations of a certain number of dittinct types which had been handed
down from a remote period, fome of them borrowed, perhaps involuntarily,
from antiquity. Hence we naturally look for the earlier and more
curious examples of this clafs of art to Italy and the fouth of France,
where the tranfition from clatlical to mediaeval was more gradual, and
the continued inlluence of clailical forms is more eaflly traced. The
early Chriiiian mafons appear to have caricatured under the form of fuch
grotefques the perfonages of the heathen mythology, and to this practice
we perhaps owe fome of the types of the mediaeval montters. We have
feen in a former chapter a grotefque from the church of Monte Majour,
near Nifmes, the original type of which had evidently been forne
burlefque figure of Saturn eating one of his children. The claflical
maik doubtlefs furnilhed the type for thofe figures, fo common in
rnediaeval fculpture, of faces with difproportionately large mouths; juft
as another favourite clais of grotefque faces, thofe with diiiended mouths
and tongues lolling out, were taken originally from the Typhons and
Gorgons of the ancients. Many other popular types of faces rendered
artihcially ugly are mere exaggerations of the dittortions produced on the
features by different operations, fuch, for inftance, as that of blowing
a horn.
The praetice of blowing the horn, is, indeed, peculiarly calculated to
u exhibit